Reprocessing and Recycling of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy) Book Price in India, Specifications, Reviews & Offers. Buy online at Amazon.

Sounds cheep 😂
If humanity will go extinct we will screw the other species left alive.
What happens to the gasses produced when plutonium oxalate goes through the calcinator?
too bad that la hague don't separate the FPs
When in solid fuel assemblies generated fission products reach 4% the reactivity slows down due to mainly bound xenon gas, which in a liquid fuel reactor would be easily separated. All of the Uranium and Plutonium and others can generate energy, but neutron impeding fission products needs to be separated out. This was invented in the 1950s by Alvin Weinberg at ORNL, and a test reactor was build and ran until early 70's. many new Gen4 projects use liquid fuel for conserving the fuel or just using "waste" as the fuel.
So, when they bury the waste and after tens of thousands of years the casing degrades, will it matter because it’s so far under ground or will it deep through the rock and soil to eventually reach the surface?
Orano/Areva/Cogema (the name keeps changing to protect the guilty) was bought out by the French government in 2016 to keep it from going bankrupt. Too bad for the French taxpayers. Its massive losses caused it to lose half of its customer base. It no longer has any international customers for its reprocessed uranium and plutonium from La Hague. Reprocessed fuel is way more expensive than uranium from the mines. It is also more difficult to operate in a reactor and requires a greater degree of shielding to prevent emissions. Reprocessing is the dirtiest, most dangerous, most polluting process in the nuclear industry. Only a minor fraction of the spent fuel is recovered and vast sums of radioactive emissions occur into the air and water from the reprocessing. Reprocessed fuel is only usable for 1 time, then it becomes nuclear waste again. The nuclear waste vitrification breaks down after about 100 years releasing the radioactivity once again into the environment. Oreno/Areva/Cogema is one of the main reasons why the French nuclear industry is at its worst state since its existence. Nuclear's share of the French electrical energy market has dropped 12% in the last decade.
Nuclear is NOT cheap at all and even nuclear LOBBYISTS agree. According to the WNSIR report and Reuters: Nuclear is also much more expensive... Solar power ranges from $36 to $44 per MWh, wind power is $29–$56 per MWh. Nuclear energy costs between $112 and $189.
Is this method needed if to use the newer MSR’s? Where does the wastewater from this process go? How much is the cost from this treatment? Is this environmental safe?
Perfect process👍any analysis on the weather change when nature been de-radiated?
The control room is a great mix of hardwired old school reliable safety systems, very modern IT, and everything inbetween.
This, right here, is why France is deserving of the title "most responsible nation in the world", and I say that sincerely as a British person. The rest of the world is so moronic for not following their example.
This is a great animation from a complicated and, I assume, expensive process.
Amazing! Its really informative.
Why not shoot the contaminated waste into outer space
Incredible graphic! Extremely valuable and helpful to understanding the entire recycling process
And some of the fission products are usable in industrial and medical applications
🥇♻️
Why am i watching this video?
What happens to the other Actinides?
Admin handsome laaa
Thanks sir explain this topic
Good sir ji