Olympus M.ZUIKO Digital ED 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6 II Lens Price in India, Specifications, Reviews & Offers. Buy online at Amazon . Compare Prices and Save!

I just bought this lens yesterday. Will put it to the test and let you know. I paid $300 Canadian. The guy bought it and decided not to use it. It was unused in the box. I also got the Olympus lens case thrown in
I love your videos, thank you
I have the Olympus M.Zuiko 14-150mm II on my Panasonic Lumix G9 and it works beautifully! I also have the Panasonic 14-140mm lens and I have to admit, I prefer the Olympus lens. The Olympus seems to be a tad sharper and has a little punchier contrast than the Panasonic lens. The Olympus also has an extra bit of telephoto reach. It's a surprisingly good zoom lens at a reasonable price!
I never much cared for this lens. My everyday lens since it's come out is the 12/100
Hi. I have for you. This lens 40-150 is good for olimpus e -510? It will work well or not? Thanks
What would be the best lens on my Oly em1mii? As travel lens for photography and video? The 12-100, the 12-200 or the 14-150? I like the ‘clutch’ MA and which one has IBIS?
This is my go to lens for tree mounth now and I don t regret my purchase. With this lens you can do everything, is ligthweight compact weather seal .
Thanks for the review.
Hi Peter, Both my wife and I have this lens( she bought hers new). I bought mine second hand and used it on my Panasonic g80, when it went faulty and could not be repaired I was devastated! So I bought a OMD 10Mk2 with this lens as part of a new deal. I was so impressed with Olympus, I gave my daughter the G80 and I now have a EM1Mk2. This combination is great for travel.
I bought mine for my E-M10 II to replace the 14-42 and 40-150 kit lenses. Then I migrated the 14-150 II lens to my NEW E-M10 IV body. It saves me changing lenses constantly. I did several city scape runs covering the whole focal length range with good corner-to corner sharpness. However, the 24 shots of Sandra in a new dress at full length, taken at about 7 feet distance, shows the depth of focus is very narrow when viewed at 400%. But Sandra and her mum found no fault with those shots.
Great and honest review! Thank you so much. I'm hanging between two lenses, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm F4-5.6 II and the Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II. I don't know wich one I schould go with. Greetings from Germany
Hi sir, what lens do u recommend if i shoot toy photography? Should i get this 40-150mm or 45mm f1.8?
Hem Peter! Thanks for the great video. I am planning on buying an OM-D E-M10 Mark III as a kit with this lens. What other lens would you recommend with it? Among the "holy trinity"?
I have this lens. It came with the camera when I bought my EM5 Mark II. Good lens.
Could you be a little more specific on your recommendation of alternative fast prime lens. Not sure what you mean by holy trinity and 1.8 series. I don't see any reference to those as lens categories on Oly website. You mentioned 2 lens but I can't find them. Maybe seeing them in writing would help. I really like my 12-100 Pro for traveling but perhaps the size of this 14-150 makes more sense.
Super. Many thanks
I'd say the 12-100mm constant f4 is the best travel lens. Both seem very good though.
I have this lens with my EM5MKII but after the last review of Zuiko 40-150 by Robin Wong I find that the quality of the photos from this 40-150 is better (more details and sharper) what do you think about it?
Can you use it with m10?
Thank you for your review, is the combo you used really weather sealed?
Heard what I needed to hear in the first 30 seconds. Love it. Sticking around for sure
Has anyone compared this to the Panasonic 14-150? I am looking for a smooth zoom for some videos and I have been told that the Panasonic version is very stiff.
Not a Pro lens!
Wieder so ein völlig unnötiges Video aus dem Wohnzimmer eines ergrauten Möchtegern-Spezialisten. Labern und dabei mit einem nicht montierten Objektiv vor der Kameralinse herumzappeln macht auf mich nicht den Eindruck von Kompetenz. Sorry!
Wonderful Thank you Subscribe! Thank you for registering （＾_＾）
an all rounder consumer lens is a pro lens? LOL
The 14-150MM f/4.0-5.6 II is not a Pro Series Lens Sir.
every time you review a lens you never show any pictures taken with the lens , so it just an advert for the lens
So this was an advertising review
GET YOURS AT OUR WEBSITE: with more experience with this lens, you can check out full samples: and saved a lot of money vs. the price in Germany, when buying this lens ◔。◔>  Shipping was not a problem and the lens arrived within 13 days without any damage.*
I noticed a Good low light picture
Tollt natuerlicheFarben. Welchen Bildmodus benutzt Du?
MAJORKOOL
Thanks for this very useful video. I'd like to know what camera you used for the video?
Hello, Great review. I got the OLYMPUS OMD EM5 M2, I'm having problems when I zoom in with my 14-150mm lens. So as soon as I zoom in a certain amount it get's very blurry. Now in this video, you zoom in, it gets blurry but get's back sharp. How do you do that? Thanks in advance!
I think you meant 28-300. Not 28-50
Thank you for a very informative review! I suppose for the price of this lens, it is a good value for those of us starting off in micro 4/3 format cameras. Thanks again!
Thank you for a very good review, I appreciate all the examples as you spoke, of all the things this lens could do. So many reviewers really do not do this and to me I want to see how it performs not HEAR only xx
that's the old Version
Amazing difference in the lenses. The worst results are quite poor. In effect your comment below to Ramon Yarritu implies a pro lens would be better than the best in all areas of these 3 lenses. Yet the 12-100 pro is 560grams, twice the 14-150. I've been very happy with my 14-150 but wonder if I should look for a pro. Only the 12-45 f4 at 254g seems a pleasing size.
Love your reviews! Anybody knows if shooting video handheld with this lens from 100 to 150mm would be stable enough? Like in the case of handheld filming birds or sports on video? Don't know if I should jump and get the em5 markiii and this lens combo for this kind of purpose, or maybe if the 12-100 stabilised pro lens would make a bigger difference on that matter. Thanks.
very good explanatory video. you should know that very much all the lenses perform better stepping down a little.
Please provide a written notice of the lebse used, especially here it is difficult to distinguish betwee 14 and 40 acoustically. By the way neither lense has resulted in accepable portraits.
Your testings are so thorough and educational, thank you. I've learned very useful information. I'll be picking up the 40-150mm simply because it's a lot sharper close range.
Thanks Rob, as always your video are informative and entertaining. Thanks for the advice at the end of the video. My 40-150 f4-5.6 just arrive and now I got 3 lenses (two kit 14-42, 40-150 & one prime 45 f1.8).
What a neat test! Really well conceived, exhaustive enough, clearly explained and analysed. I happen to like your presentation style very much. And, finally you give us helpful purchasing advice. Well done and thank you.
Hi Rob, Thanks for your great videos. I have EM10 Mark II + Zuiko F1.8 45mm + Zuiko 14-42 mm kit lens. I would like to have another lens especially for street photographing. What would you buy in my place? 40-150 mm ?
My E-M10 II came with the 14-42 plus the 40-150 kit lenses. Changing lenses during cruise ship departures lost video footage. Then I got the weather-resistant 14-150 II, then recently the E-M10 IV body. The 14-150 is in use almost exclusively now on the E-M10 IV body, with more reliable focusing as I zoom As a rule of thumb, on video trips into town and back, I prefer the whole focal range without messing with lens changes. I use the E-M10 IV for video, and the E-M10 II with 40-150 for stills while the video is running. Another 14-150 II for the E-M10 II might be on the table when I get the next tax return.
Rob, thanks for going to all the effort. However, I do have all three lenses the 14-150mm is the one that stays glued to my E-M1 Mkll when I'm not doing a professional shoot. It bothered me that your test at 40mm showed such poor results for the 14-150mm vs the 40-150mm @ 39/40mm. I set my camera up in my studio on a tripod, using window light and did shots of a baseball cap that I have at ISO200, f/5.6 using the 2 Sec timer I did shots at 40mm and 100mm. In both cases the shots were extremely sharp with excellent detail, with the very slight edge going to the 14-150mm. I only compared focus point sharpness, since my concern was the obvious difference in your portrait test. That said, there may have been a focusing issue with your test shots, or your 14-150mm is just not as sharp as my copy. As an aside, one reason I love my 14-150mm is that I bought it used in 'mint' condition, and it only cost me $19. :-) I had won an online photo competition and was awarded a $300 gift certificate to Adorama. They had this lens listed in their 'Used' Department for $319. I love it when stuff like this happens. :-)
If money is an issue for $99 the 40-150 is a no brainer. Works great on my EM10.2. I'm saving up for the 100-400 next spring. I'll match it with my EM1.2 for wildlife shots. Nice video. Again!
Rob, nice comparison.
Got the 14-42 kit lens and the 40-150 as a combo with my E-PL5 years ago. The 40-150 is a good light telephoto, even better when you get it for free as part of a promo. Now that I have an E-M5III and the 12-40 & 40-150 pro lenses the older kit lenses stay on the shelf but I still can’t bring my self to sell them. The 14-150 that came with my E-M5III went into my wife’s bag but I still have it available as an option.
Results were a surprise to me. Good job Rob. My little collapsing 14-40 EZ is pocketable mounted on a small body and 40-150 take up very little no space and weigh nothing so an absolute delight to carry when out and about on holiday. Yeah, if you have the range covered by 2 lenses already, no real need to rush out to buy the bigger 1-does-it-all as a replacement. You don’t even gain in weather-sealing.
Thanks for the interesting comparison. I would like to add that quite a strong feature of 14-150mm is its better closest focusing distance at longer focal lengths. It means better occasional closeups when travelling or walking.
I don’t have the 14-150 and don’t mind carrying the weight of the two f2.8 pro lenses. When I go out on a photo shoot, just myself, swapping lenses is not an issue either. When I go on a walk or travel with friends, family or my partner this becomes different. Carrying an extra bag is suddenly not so convenient when you also have to take the dog. Others who are with you don’t have the patience for you to evaluate a scene and then spend some more time swapping lenses. I will typically just have the 12-40 PRO on my camera which means any Tele shots are missed. Those are the cases when I think I would love the 14-150 or maybe saving up for the 12-100 f4 PRO IS which will also do a lot better in low light due to IS.
14-150 ii is a great travel kit specially for daylight, I pair it with the 17mm f1.8 for lowlight as a quite practical travel combo
Hi Rob Hope all is well. I got a quick question for you. The MX1 is it a better camera then the M1 mark iii or mark ii?
Great review. Totally agree with all your points. I have the 14-42 EZ and the 40-150. I seldom use any of them, because I have become addicted to the Panasonic 25mm f/1.7, because it ALWAYS does the job for me. I have to clean the dust off off the other lenses now that the weather is much better here. Still very dusty though. I really liked your indoor lighting in this video. Thank you very much for your time and effort.
Great video. I have all 3 lenses and the EZ 14-42. I've been planning to get rid of the 40-150 as I didn't see the point of it but your video is food for thought. You were using the 40-150 at it's extreme (40mm) whereas the 14-150 is almost in mid range at 40mm and perhaps that was an unfair comparison. The 14-150 is perhaps now welded to my camera.