Kenko PRO 300 AF DGX 2.0X Teleconvertors Lens (For Nikon) Price in India, Specifications, Reviews & Offers. Buy online at Amazon . Compare Prices and Save!

thank you for this useful review. it is quite clear that this 2x extender works pretty well with the camera and lens combination that you have. the experience took place in bright daylight though, considering the shutter speed of 1/2000, have you tried with less light? with about a shutter speed of 1/250 or so? what about a moon shot? thank you for your time and greetings from Chile!
*_Paring it with my Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 I now have a very good focal length with a great f stop!>_**_imgs.love/zSigma?qC_**_ It's a huge step up from any kit lens and unless you're getting a full frame lens such as the new Canon RF series...this lens is definitely what you're looking for. I do both photography and cinematography and am very happy with it._*
If you were to put the Kenko DGX Teleplus PRO 300 2x N-AF on an older version of the Nikon 80-400mm f / 4.5-5.6D ED (2000-2013), would autofocus be able to work on that lens like the video you showed.
sir you recommend this to buy?
sorry i have nikon lens 80-200 af d 2.8 almost same like u different gen if i use tc kenko is diafragma still can be set from the body dx sir? how about if i use with tc from nikon new series it does not work ya?
Price ?Would this work on a Tamron 150-600mm VC USD (D600-D810 bodies) ? Thanks !
Thanks for posting this up. I wonder what degradation there would be in image quality with this brand of teleconverter, as opposed to the Nikon version.Seems to be quite a reduction in focus speed though.
Honestly, despite what you're saying, I think the images without the extender actually look sharper than the ones with the extender. Maybe you messed up the labeling in some of the shots? Or something to do with Youtube compression? E.g. the shot of the church, the left side appears to have more detail. Are you sure that was the shot with out the extender? Because in the next shot you switch the sides.
Can I combined 2 no of 2x Teleconverter? Do I need to modify the Teleconverters or I can just stack them directly. Planning to use it for planetary image stacking for my Nikon 200-500 lens
I have the same tamron sp lens and a7rii and EOS rp , I am using a mc11 but focusing is not as good as on canon. Which adapter are you using for canon to Sony?
if a person wanted to increase their view of the moon, could you stack multiple X2 exterders ?example; 5 or 6 extenders ?
Thank you, very informative
Does anyone know if it works on Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM?
What about putting the converter on a 600mm and get 1200mm :-) anyone try that?
Does it work with Canon 4000D and Tamron 18-200mm?
I have the same one and I use it with my 18-55mm as a macro extension tube type thing and it works great!
I signed in just to like this video. Great information,thank you!
Sup mates!! Can i use it with Sigma Art 135mm 1.8 lens ?
Bro you saved me! I had the sigma extender in my cart!
4 minutes of waffling....
Finally a great review. You saved me up some bucks. Teleconverter Pros: higher focal length. Cons: loss of sharpness, details and amount of light, increases chromatic aberration. So still better to make a precise focus and crop the image, instead of using teleconverters. Do the focal length really matter for you? Buy a better telephoto lens. It will more expensive and heavy af, but at least it gives better quality.
Very good review mon ami :)Clean that two spots in the middle of the A7r II sensor before Chile and Hawaii, please... XD
Awesome review! Thanks a lot! That Tamron 100-300, fit on A6500 sony?
Hello Adrien! Fantastic video!It's good that you'll be in Chile to film the eclipse!I tell you that you will be very close to us, I am from Argentina, Neuqun, you could take a little walk around here! jajajSee you in February, as we will be by Senja on that date!Regards!!!
Shooting with the Sony camera and a Canon mount lens, your setup means you also are using the MC11 adapter?
Have a ball in Chile bud.