Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Lens Price in India, Specifications, Reviews & Offers. Buy online at TATACliq Croma Flipkart Snapdeal . Compare Prices and Save!

this lens use canon camera DSLR200D
Very Surprised how this lens performed much better on a full frame camera :O
This moster purple fringing really killed a photo that I took of a bird. In my 20D (jurassic, I know) it really killed the details.
I really like your video..... Thanks....
I just bought this lens for 80 euros. I use it for wildlife fotography with a tripod. No problems so far. Except for the noise. It's pretty loud. But it's a cheap way to get some distance between you and your "target"...
Will it work with 5D mark iii?
Glad i avoid this lens. 55-250 is really the best value telephoto lens for canon apsc...
Hey would you recommend this lens for beginners? I use this lens at my high school for events.
According to this review its a worst lens. According to me its a gud lens.
Great, detailed review. Thanks.
Can this be used with a canon rebel xsi?
Is there stabilization?
who else cringed at the fingerprint on the lens at the beginning
Still pretty good Im actually watching it right now
The lens is actually really good on full frame. But on apsc sensors, it's basically unusable at anything over 150mm. I mean it's so soft, you can't make out any detail.
got this lens as "free" as it came with my 1300D 3 years ago. Now i have to say, it's not the best lens and it's give HUGE chromatic aberrations at 200+mm however, it's fairly good under that, i found that the sweet spot is around 135mm. great lens to start with if you only need an occasional telephoto on bright days
New photographer here. Will this work on my rebel T7?
Very good review regarding the 200 to 300mm range. The image quality at 300mm was almost pathetic. From 75 to 200mm it's average at best. Thank you.
Is it good for canon m50 by using adapter
Cut your nails
5:39 76
To mujhe up masage kar k please boliea
Seckend hand koie market ha
Mujhe kharid na ha chip price ma
Dada kitna laga paisa
Price koto
Kitna price liya bhai?
Whole videos " to dosto"
price to Rs. 31000 dikha rha h,or aap bol rhe ho only Rs.8500
Good job
BROTHER IF YOU BUY THIS ONE NO FREE LENS HOOD?I MEAN LENS HOOD NOT INCLUDED?THANK...
It certainly blurs well tha tbackground, awesomely. But I felt like it isnt tvery sharp, what do you think? About sharpness. Good video! Thanks!
Bhai Amazon ka link nhi h description me, pls provide link
Why people keep saying this lense is bad i have this lense and its good its worth 200 its not that cheap
thank you, almost bought one
What lens are u going to suggest is probably 2x more expensive. Its a good lens I use it for wildlife and get sharp results.
A lot of people do not understand photography
Can i use this for Mirrorless? Beginner.
It came with kit.
Learn English before posting videos
Thanks for the video very informative
I'm a beginner with a Canon Rebel t3. It came with two lenses, but I don't know how to use them (of course).1. the 18-55 mm only goes to f3.5 not lower. Do I need a different lens to go lower like f2-f1.4?2. When I attach the 75 -300 mm lens and try to adjust the f-stops, it won't do it, it shows "f00"Can anyone please help with this. Thanks!
I've just bought a Canon M50 kit and it's true the quality is not good but it's fine to learn. Or maybe I'm just saying this because I don't want to think my money is on the trash :')
if you wann give it away, i'd take it. But what other prisewise similar lense can you get. I've used the tamaron and canon 75-300 lense and the canon was way better
Bro you know shit about this
lens is fine
Dude I don't understand how this lens is not great I am a professional photographer and imuse this lens for my street photography work and I get great results and if you don't believe me check out my work on my photography page on instagram at adamlittlemorephotography
just bought this lense on ebay for 60$ to start astrophotography on a budget. on cloudynights.com there are actually people who have taken respectable photos of nebula with this lense. its not a good lense but on a budget it can get you into a hobbie.
i don't get why people are complaining that it's a cheap lens, therefore is fine for a budget photographer. no it's not. he reviewed it based on its performance, not its value. there are far better, cheaper options that offer better optics and actually have stabilization, such as the 55-250mm. just because its cheap, doesn't justify the awful quality. look at the nifty fifty - it's the cheapest lens on the canon store, but has incredible image quality, although it is lacking in stabilization, though that is made up for with its fast aperture and intended use-case. just because you bought this lens and don't like that he said mean things about it, doesn't mean that the review is wrong, or bad. it means you don't want to admit to yourself that you wasted your money.
My 55-250 far superior to this 75-300 which I regret buying. The far end focus accuracy is not even close to my other zoom. I suspect Sigma would be an improvement, I know Tamron has a better zoom since I own one but the contacts stopped communicating . I will watch more often and save myself some money. Thanks
I was ablut to slay you boii. Yes most lens are bad if u shoot jpeg on auto. Df. This lens is not that bad. It was my first lens and now i have 8 and still use it.
I want to buy the worst canon lens ever, because i like it. Haha
Ive had this lens for awhile and it never gave me any problems. If youre a pro then of course buy something better but for an amateur this is perfect. Daytime shots are pretty good and sharp but night shots can get a little fuzzy since it doesnt have IS thats pretty much my only complaint about it.
LOL however heres something odd I have discovered with this lens. I have used it on my 6d and results quite poor - washed out images however I put it in my M50 with a viltrox M2 speedbooster and its a very different story. Sharp images, very little CA and I get f 2.8 at 75mm. Guessing the dual pixel AF and speedbooster help but I get VERY good images now with this setup. Just thought Id mention.
Please see Chris's later review of this lens in which he points out that this one is rather harsh and shows just how good this lens really is.
Will this lens fit on a canon eos rebel T100 dslr camera?
I was consider buy the 40-150 mm Pro, but I have this , honestly, is a great lens imgs.love/Olympus7 i think can have results very near that pro series and if just eventually need for sometimes telephoto shots, this are the best choice , Also make good portraits, with the IBIS from OMD 5 mark I, make a nice job in stabilization, just some pro lens come with Stabilizatiin, all Olympus Camera come with IBIS
Have the older version with the Apature ring for a film camera it works fine on my Pentax K50 do to IBIS at 300mm the pictures are very useable I guess I got lucky because when I bought the lens Pentax did not have IBIS at the time on the * istDL and yes I still have the 6.1 megapixel camera
I used this to take pictures of some birds, the dang thing makes the birds so purple.
Sir, you are my go to, whenever I am in search for new lenskeep up the good work!Subscibed
Image quality is good?
I have one question: Does it work with a 4000d
This video makes me feel like trash for not being able to afford the real expensive stuff.
Does this lens have an Image stabilizer? Please answer, sir, I want to buy this lens. Thank you
I Can Use 5d Mark 2 Camera for This lens?
"it's not a complete piece of trash but.."no hate just a funny comment
2:00
This lens was $100 and the 55-250 cheapest I see is $230 before tax and shipping (Canada) that's why I bought it
I suppose this lens is good for people who are doing photography as a hobby, for a professional I would probably say they would want a much more powerful lens with image stabilization but lenses are expensive and for 80 on UK Amazon its not a bad price, personally I thought the images were good but it really depends on what you expect as a photographer yourself. All photographers have different opinions and standards when it comes to their work.
I bought this lens used for EUR 40 (about 30) and I made some great nature photo's with it on my EOS 50D. You are right, it is certainly not one of the best, but for an amateur like me a great lens to start with and do a bit of experimenting. For those who go into nature occasionally and want to make some nice close ups of animals that would otherwise be impossible I think this is a good lens. If you want top quality images, yes you will have to buy a (much) more expensive one.
I own and use this lens for portraits and model photography in the past and its actually quite good. Im a bit surprised you gave it such a horrible review lol. I would recommend for anyone learning or even a skilled photographer. Its an inexpensive handy backup lens.
can this leans attached in canon 300D ?
It feels very.. Eh, economical lmao too funny