Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens Price in India, Specifications, Reviews & Offers. Buy online at Flipkart TATACliq Shopclues Amazon . Compare Prices and Save!

Hi Chris, "The image stabilisation is a bit noisy" but then we see a Sigma lens . am i missing something ? :)
Is it still worth it to buy this lens the IS version f4 for about 500$ ? I know the mark2 is about 900-1000 . Used ofcouse
Um he says IS is noisy so if you are doing video to use a external microphone but pans out to a sigma lens with noise?
Hi I've heard this performs really bad on a 90d
should i buy this for my canon 250d
is USM that noicy?
Loved this lens - I remember saving up and buying it back in 2008, used it quite a lot on general. Ended up selling it and regretted that decision ever since. Found a 2nd hand one for £440, bought it straight away and I'm now loving it all over again on my EOS R. In really nice condition too! Absolute bargin, they easily go for £600 or more 2nd hand.
Lovely video
Just ordered one ☝️
Great review. Is the noise from the IS are the same when taking photos? Thank you!
which model of canon dslr did you use for this video. i am planning to get this lens to use for 750d. can i get the same image quality? and another question: were those pictures edited(brightness/ contrast/ colour combinations etc )? or just the original ones?
your site is very helpful have you tried reviewing the Sigma 70-200 equivalent (like the HSM Macro 2 or the current Sports version). how does it perform?
I recently bought this lens for my canon 50D. It’s a fantastic lens every shot on this old camera looks fresh colourful sharp and always get focus right in auto focus
in your video at 70mm i found this lens not sharp ? but you say it s sharp ! at 200mm ok! it s sharp am i wrong ?
So that's one lens rules all? How about f/2.8?
*I like this lens a lot✨>?ヤケ    I use it mostly with my a6000. Autofocus is fast and the OSS works. The tripod mounting foot only needs an arca-swiss style dove-tail milled in so we wouldn't have to bolt one on.*
Now we need new review of mark 2 of 70-200 f4 IS L
Outstanding review!
Your voice and the background music makes the review a whole lot better. Not that the review itself isn't great.
Still good enough for about 600€ in 2020? :D
Would you still consider this lens?
I just bought On 4L
Great video, just curious about one thing. What do you men about colour as a con?
Shheeeeed I'm trying to find out if it's worth buying in 2020
Hi, should I buy this len used or the tamron 70-210 f/4 brand new? Which one is a better len ?
Well I was lucky enough to find a store at Edinburgh airport selling their last first gen IS model at huge discount. So instead of £818 UK it was only £518 and it was a brand new boxed unit. At that kinda deal it’s a no brainer
I’ve CANON 6D with 50mm f/1.4 lens I would like to buy new zoom lens can you please suggest me one Budget would be 500-600$
I saw that you were using a sony a7iii with MC-11 adapter. How well does this combo work exactly, would you say it's as good as a native lens?
3:00 So this doesn't have a fast shutter speed? "Good for telephoto photos on sunny days" but not cloudy days or indoors. Wouldn't a handheld tripod sort this?
1:05 Ya sound like Steve Harley and the Cockney Rebel
I love this lens, it's perfect for landscapes and when shooting from a tripod IS is not a problem.
Is it still worth it to buy this lens the IS version f4 for about 500$ ? I know the mark2 is about 900-1000 . Used ofcouse
Price of lens plz
Have had my eye on this lens for awhile and finally pulled the trigger ?まえ So happy I decided to get it. Just a really good lens. Very happy.
Do you think this will work well on Canon M50? I would not use it to do video as I am not interested in video but for wild life photography.
Hello, thank you for this video. I have a 6D and am searching for a telephoto lens for 300-400€. I found the 120-400mm Sigma and this 70-200mm L for more or less the same price, but I don't know which one would be better for me. I wanted a telephoto lens for Surfpictures, and the 400mm from sigma seems like a pretty good long telephoto for that, but I'm a bit scared of it's size and weight. The L attracts me with it's awesome image quality but I'm not sure if the 200mm are enough. Another issue is that I'm not sure how often I really will shoot Surfpictures (when the waves are good, I'm in the water instead of taking pictures), so that maybe the L also would be good for my nature photography, which I normally do. So my question is: Is the 120-400mm really that weighty and is it's image quality fine, compared to the L? And are the 200mm of the L enough, or is it worth it to go with half focal length for the better quality? Can I crop my 6D image with the L to get closer images without loosing that much quality? Would be awesome if anybody can help me
You mentioned in a later video that this lens doesn’t got into your sharpest lens selection because it is soft in the corners and borders. Yes Incan confirm this. This lens is kinda overhyped. I don’t see it being better than the 55-250 STM lens on crop bodies, it’s worse especially at the borders.
I bad one todays for 250€ great
Hey Chris, Can you review this lens again in 2019 (as per your full frame and APSC camera standards)?
Does this lens work with canon 1500d?
Would this lens be ideal for whale watching in Alaska?
Does this lens work canon t6 reble
"And "L" means "Luxwury" I could imagine the smug look on your face . lol
Will I damage the lens if it is in auto focus and I turn the focus ring?
Will this fit a Canon EOS 1200D?
My favorite lense, even non stabilized. Recently I caught a flying eagle at.2500/sec at F5. My sharpest pic ever! On the opposit I use it for studio portraits ligt up with soft boxes. I increase the ISO and use it without tripod. A great lense.
I want this lens just to look cool cause white lens looks more sexy then black
Is it sharp with canon 90d ?
Great job Chris. Maybe you can test the Sigma 135mm f1. 8 on the M6II, very interested in the result as im looking into one for my 90D.
Chris, as I thought had originally commented, were price not an issue, would certainly have purchased the 70-200 2.8. Fwiw, have the 24-70 L 2.8. On my 6D most of the time. Superb bokeh and IQ. Sometimes use Canon 85 1.8 prime.
Hi, unrelated to this great review. do you think canon will launch a 6D III in the coming years? Something like that could fit my requirements in terms of pricing and performance and I'm looking for thoughts on the matter.
How did that sensor get that dirty ? hahahha
I bought this lens as a grey import for approx £900 (I did my research on reputable companies) and initially paired it with my Canon 80D where it seemed to work well. I've since changed that for an Eos R and it seems to be even better. As I primarily shoot landscapes I see no reason to go for the f2.8 version due to expense and weight. I guess if I had enough spare cash I would but by the time you add another lens or 2 plus body and accessories for me the weight/cost wasn't worth it. For £900 incl. a reputable company warranty I think it's well worth the price.
Hi Chris, I really like your reviews. I have an M6 Mk2 and I seriously considered the 70-200 f4, but opted for the 55-250 ef-s after seeing your stellar review of it. I’m glad I went with the 55-250 as the M6 seems to be just as brutal to the L glass. I can see the 55-250 is softish at the long end, but I’m interested in your thoughts. Do you still have your 55-250 and could you review it on your M6? I’m interested to see how close it is to the 70-200 f4. Cheers and look forward to more of your adapted reviews.
heyyyy my first l lens was a 70-200 f/4 am i a cooooool kiddddd
Or you buy for less money an used EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II lens with brighter aperture.
I have the older one and it is an outstanding lens. When you auto-focus all you hear is an almost whisper silent "Ha". And it always locks dead on. I find that it along with its sister 24-70 f4 I'm covered from 24 to 200 mm. The only two lenses I really need outside. And although not a macro lens it gets close enough to flowers to make them look as if they were shot with a macro. Great Lens. Plus the f4 has been about $1,000 cheaper than the f2.8 version.
I was able to buy this lens last christmas used/refurbished for 650€. I'm still very happy with the purchase, the only thing I regret is to not be able to spend more time with the lens. I used it on a crop sensor by the way, but I decided to get this lens anyways as an investment in the future, when I will purchase a better body. Very nice review of the lens, which made me happy with my choice last year. :)
Canon sensors seem to be inferior to Sony's.
Your new uploads frustrate me since I had purchased M6mark2 months ago. What would be the most suitable lens for M6mark2? What is the use of having such high numbers of pixels if it can not make clear images even with the canon ' L ’ lens?
Is it me or the front element looks small
The Mark I was an excellent choice, never aged, one of there very most solid options in Canon's lineup. Mark II will not get the same success due to mirrorless is eating up the market. This Mark II is excellent on an EOS R as well, gust the R 70-200 2.8 is just as portable (!) We will see what kind of lens Canon will provide to put the adequate answer to the mirrorless market, I am looking forward.
I bought this lens last year. I like it. Its much quicker than the last on. Great pics.
It'd be great if you would do a review of the Canon RF 85mm f/2 macro IS STM lens. It's listed at$599 USD. Thanks.
Hello Christopher Could you make comparison between this lens and the non-is ? I've heard they are as sharp. Could it be true ?
OMG Sensor dust 3:20
oh your sensor is dirty :D